Personal tools

Participatory design research: Difference between revisions

From Oneville Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Our process of participatory design research has been our method of learning, with community members, which communications need to be improved and how to do it. See [[OneVille's principles]].
EDITING THIS


Researchers and companies typically design tech tools for education and then head to schools to try them. Many avoid the bottlenecks of public schools altogether. Policymakers typically just tell youth and educators regulations constraining such tools’ use in public schools. Put together, this leaves young people, families, and educators in “traditional” public schools with little power to direct the use of technology in 21st century public education. So, how might diverse youth, educators, families, and researchers instead come together to co-design uses of social and digital media that effectively support young people’s learning in diverse, mixed-income, and traditional public schools? How might such efforts transform public schools from the inside out?
Our process of participatory design research has been our method of learning, with community members, which communications need to be improved and how to improve them. See [[OneVille's principles]].


What's been particularly exciting to us about working in Somerville is that we've had the chance to engage young people, families and teachers in design efforts to bring tech into the everyday core of life and communication in “regular” public schools.
Researchers and companies typically design tech tools for education and then head to schools to try them. Many avoid the bottlenecks of public schools altogether. Policymakers typically just tell youth and educators regulations constraining such tools’ use in public schools. Put together, this leaves young people, families, and educators in “traditional” public schools with little power to direct the use of technology in 21st century public education. So, how might diverse youth, educators, families, and researchers instead come together to co-design uses of tech to support young people’s learning and success in diverse, mixed-income, and traditional public schools? How might such efforts transform public schools from the inside out?


The OneVille Project has been a fully cooperative exploration of how commonplace technology might help diverse people work together toward youths’ success by helping them share information, efforts, and resources. The best way to learn about possible communication solutions, we have argued, is to work together with students, parents, and educators to design them -- to determine who needed to share which information with whom and then test ways to facilitate that communication. We have designed and tested improvements to the communication infrastructure by joining educators, families, and young people in work designed to improve and innovate in education, while studying it. This is participatory design research -- for many of us, a new application of ethnographic methods.
What has been particularly exciting to us about working in Somerville is that we've had the chance to engage young people, families and teachers in design efforts to bring tech into the everyday core of life and communication in “regular” public schools.  


Ethnography is about XXX. The method assumes that some phenomena that are crucially important to young people, to educators, to families, cannot be understood unless you are there, and participating and observing everyday life and asking questions of people in person. Understanding some phenomena, like everyday communication needs and experiences in public schools, requires forming real relationships with people, experiencing the communications they experience, and analyzing those communications over time.
The OneVille Project has been a fully cooperative exploration of how commonplace technology might help diverse people work together toward youths’ success by helping them share information, efforts, and resources.  


Participatory design research, which Dede (xx) calls a form of ethnography (CITE), IS about YYYY. [CITES HERE to design research and community-based/action research]
We have found that the best way to learn about possible communication solutions is to work together with students, parents, and educators to design them -- to determine who needs to share which information with whom and then test ways to facilitate that communication.


In Somerville, we began with xxx, and ended up doing ZZZ.
So, we have designed and tested improvements to the communication infrastructure of public education by joining educators, families, and young people in work designed to improve and innovate in education -- while studying it. This is participatory design research -- for many of us, a new application of ethnographic methods. Ethnography, a method from anthropology and sociology, involves documenting people's everyday actions. Design research has researchers participating in trying to actually solve a problem or improve upon a situation, while studying the effort, its snags, and its redirections (Dede xx and other sources xxxx). Put those together: understanding everyday communication needs in public schools and communities requires forming real relationships with people, experiencing the communications they experience, trying to improve those communications, and analyzing the work over time in order to keep improving it.


In this daily collaboration with people in Somerville, we’ve realized the need to improve the entire communication infrastructure of public schools and also grasped the potential of technology for doing so. Had we been too afraid to leap over the cliff methodologically or to join people in an attempt to improve something, we would have learned nothing new at all. So, we’re coming to see that joining educators, youth, and families in efforts to improve schools, while rigorously studying those efforts in detail, may be one of the most important ways available to us of actually improving education.
We began our work in Somerville with a year of fieldwork, interviews, and trial and error exploration, to understand current communication issues in Somerville and to test ways of linking people in efforts to support young people. For example, we piloted multilingual coffee hours to get diverse parents talking to one another for the first time across boundaries of program, income, and language about shared issues in their schools; we piloted academic “reading night” events to partner families who had never talked before about learning; we participated in the typical data drudgery of schooling, by entering missing data on individual children into a school’s common spreadsheet; we started an afterschool club and then joined a summer school class, and began to test a private social network allowing students to communicate about school outside of class with peers and potentially teachers. We then broke up into our six working groups, each tackling different aspects of communications needed to support young people. Susan shepherded the [[ePortfolio]] project at Somerville High School; Uche and Mica, our [[mobile messaging support team|texting support team at Full Circle/Next Wave, the district's alternative middle and high school; Mica, Seth, and then Jedd the [[data dashboard]] project at the Healey K-8 School; and Mica, with Seth's tech support, the [[Parent connector project]] and broader exploration into a [[schoolwide communication toolkit.]] Each working group broadened to include Somerville participants of all ages, language groups, and levels of tech interest.
 
We're exhausted, but truly excited. In this daily collaboration with people in Somerville, we’ve come to see that joining educators, youth, and families in efforts to improve schools, while rigorously studying those efforts in detail, may be one of the most important ways available to us of actually improving education.

Revision as of 13:38, 27 May 2011

EDITING THIS

Our process of participatory design research has been our method of learning, with community members, which communications need to be improved and how to improve them. See OneVille's principles.

Researchers and companies typically design tech tools for education and then head to schools to try them. Many avoid the bottlenecks of public schools altogether. Policymakers typically just tell youth and educators regulations constraining such tools’ use in public schools. Put together, this leaves young people, families, and educators in “traditional” public schools with little power to direct the use of technology in 21st century public education. So, how might diverse youth, educators, families, and researchers instead come together to co-design uses of tech to support young people’s learning and success in diverse, mixed-income, and traditional public schools? How might such efforts transform public schools from the inside out?

What has been particularly exciting to us about working in Somerville is that we've had the chance to engage young people, families and teachers in design efforts to bring tech into the everyday core of life and communication in “regular” public schools.

The OneVille Project has been a fully cooperative exploration of how commonplace technology might help diverse people work together toward youths’ success by helping them share information, efforts, and resources.

We have found that the best way to learn about possible communication solutions is to work together with students, parents, and educators to design them -- to determine who needs to share which information with whom and then test ways to facilitate that communication.

So, we have designed and tested improvements to the communication infrastructure of public education by joining educators, families, and young people in work designed to improve and innovate in education -- while studying it. This is participatory design research -- for many of us, a new application of ethnographic methods. Ethnography, a method from anthropology and sociology, involves documenting people's everyday actions. Design research has researchers participating in trying to actually solve a problem or improve upon a situation, while studying the effort, its snags, and its redirections (Dede xx and other sources xxxx). Put those together: understanding everyday communication needs in public schools and communities requires forming real relationships with people, experiencing the communications they experience, trying to improve those communications, and analyzing the work over time in order to keep improving it.

We began our work in Somerville with a year of fieldwork, interviews, and trial and error exploration, to understand current communication issues in Somerville and to test ways of linking people in efforts to support young people. For example, we piloted multilingual coffee hours to get diverse parents talking to one another for the first time across boundaries of program, income, and language about shared issues in their schools; we piloted academic “reading night” events to partner families who had never talked before about learning; we participated in the typical data drudgery of schooling, by entering missing data on individual children into a school’s common spreadsheet; we started an afterschool club and then joined a summer school class, and began to test a private social network allowing students to communicate about school outside of class with peers and potentially teachers. We then broke up into our six working groups, each tackling different aspects of communications needed to support young people. Susan shepherded the ePortfolio project at Somerville High School; Uche and Mica, our [[mobile messaging support team|texting support team at Full Circle/Next Wave, the district's alternative middle and high school; Mica, Seth, and then Jedd the data dashboard project at the Healey K-8 School; and Mica, with Seth's tech support, the Parent connector project and broader exploration into a schoolwide communication toolkit. Each working group broadened to include Somerville participants of all ages, language groups, and levels of tech interest.

We're exhausted, but truly excited. In this daily collaboration with people in Somerville, we’ve come to see that joining educators, youth, and families in efforts to improve schools, while rigorously studying those efforts in detail, may be one of the most important ways available to us of actually improving education.