Outside Examples: Difference between revisions
From Oneville Wiki
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=== School Victories === | === School Victories === | ||
==== Mark's review ==== | |||
Our review: This site may be useful but it isn't getting much use and doesn't have many catalytic functions designed in. Doesn't help groups join forces to pool resources around a common nationwide event day. | Our review: This site may be useful but it isn't getting much use and doesn't have many catalytic functions designed in. Doesn't help groups join forces to pool resources around a common nationwide event day. | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
Based on the sparseness of entries, I'm guessing the site is not actively scraping other sites and aggregating and tagging that info here. Nor are there tools of emergent awareness: a tag cloud, for example, of entries and activities and group missions. | Based on the sparseness of entries, I'm guessing the site is not actively scraping other sites and aggregating and tagging that info here. Nor are there tools of emergent awareness: a tag cloud, for example, of entries and activities and group missions. | ||
==== [[Taxonomy_vs_Folksonomy | Taxonomy]] ==== | |||
While School Victories tries to segment the audience of the site via the right curricula (source group, target group, group/class size, geographic location and others), they fail to allow for emergent grouping (folksonomy) and focused data analysis. | |||
;Example: Group size ranges = 1-10, 11-25, 26-50, 51-100, 100+. | |||
This | |||
==== Publicity ==== | |||
No evidence of a [http://twitter.com/#search?q="school%20victories" social media campaign] of promotion. | No evidence of a [http://twitter.com/#search?q="school%20victories" social media campaign] of promotion. | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 23 May 2010
Comparison to Existing 'Network' Attempts
- DO SUCH NETWORKS ALREADY EXIST? MARK AND SETH, THIS IS WHERE I NEED YOU. I HAVE THIS (edited slightly) FROM THE FORD LANGUAGE. THINK IT'S TRUE?
Existing web hubs, like the “What Works Clearinghouse” or “Edutopia,” house useful but undistilled knowledge, and they are hard for the public to search and easily use; most sites also allow for no public input into defining or naming “what works” in local places. While the Network will link the public to these existing knowledge “hubs,” it will focus on linking the public to examples that both researchers and the public find particularly useful for increasing young people’s opportunities to learn.
Review of other networks
School Victories
Mark's review
Our review: This site may be useful but it isn't getting much use and doesn't have many catalytic functions designed in. Doesn't help groups join forces to pool resources around a common nationwide event day.
It's not very inspired or imaginative. The "feel" and personality are more institutional than lively warm community in nature. I don't think, as a media specialist, that this site is designed to spark interest and cross-cutting partnership. It's mostly listing driven. Plus it seems text-driven rather than graphically driven; more Internet-past than Internet-present or future. It would be interesting to compare a search here to a search in the standard google window or in the edutopia site.
Based on the sparseness of entries, I'm guessing the site is not actively scraping other sites and aggregating and tagging that info here. Nor are there tools of emergent awareness: a tag cloud, for example, of entries and activities and group missions.
Taxonomy
While School Victories tries to segment the audience of the site via the right curricula (source group, target group, group/class size, geographic location and others), they fail to allow for emergent grouping (folksonomy) and focused data analysis.
- Example
- Group size ranges = 1-10, 11-25, 26-50, 51-100, 100+.
This
Publicity
No evidence of a "school%20victories" social media campaign of promotion.